Saturday, January 26, 2008

Movies Are ??? Than Ever

The movie There Will be Blood has been hailed with near unanimous critical praise. The word among the cognoscenti is that it’s a lock for Best Picture. Thus it was with high expectations that I recently attended a showing. Well, Oscar sure thing or not, the principal accolade it got from me during its two hours and thirty-eight minutes was my most-glances-at-my-watch-during-a-movie award. Seventeen glances, if memory serves me.

Which got me to thinking, are not movies longer than they used to be? Or have to be? Or am I just emulating the younger generation; is it that my attention span is getting shorter?

I remember that during the heyday of the Hollywood studio system, the directors were simply employees of the studios (along with the actors and all the other talent). They were given a budget, and they adhered to it or else they found themselves on a new milk route in the morning. Louis B. Mayer (or Harry Cohn, or Jack Warner, or any of the studio bosses) would tell the director that he’s got this much money and that many people to bring in a 90-minute movie, and that’s it.

Today, of course, the whole system has changed. In particular, the director is not only not an employee, he’s an
 auteur. And more often than not, he has final-cut rights. So it seems clear that in this new world of film-making, there are few constraints on a movie’s length. Few checks and balances. Is this the case? Are movies indeed longer than they used to be?

To attempt to answer this question other than anecdotally, I decided to look at the lengths of Academy Award nominees in recent years (2003-2007) and compare them with lengths of movies made 70 years ago at the height of the studio system (1933-1937). Here are the results:
Picture 8
So to the extent my samples are representative of the entire industry, movies are longer than they used to be, 23 minutes longer. (Whatever happened to the fabled cutting-room floor?)

Which brings up another question: do great movies
 have to be two hours-plus? I think the answer is clearly no. Yes, it’s true that some of the greats have been unusually long:
Picture 4
But are three-hour lengths needed to make a classic? Or even two hours? Many (most?) of the great classics have been brought in at sub-two-hour lengths:
Picture 5
And if we look at some of the classics (other than Oz and GWTW) from the studio-dominated 1930s, almost all were shortish. As examples:
Picture 6
Another interesting illustration of the bloat that has distended movies can be discerned by comparing originals with remakes. The 1934 Cleopatra(Claudette Colbert) came in at a brisk 1:42. In 1963, Elizabeth Taylor’s version of Cleopatra limped in at 3:12 , one and a half hours longer (with a million more extras). Or Charles Laughton’s Mutiny on the Bounty took 2:12, while Marlon Brando’s remake needed 3:05.

In 1930, almost two-thirds of the American population went to the movies every week. Today, that number is less than 10 percent. This startling decline in the role of movies in our entertainment lives has been explained by many analysts in many ways. I mention it here only because in the early 1950s, when television began to exact its devastating toll and movie attendance went into free fall, Hollywood responded with the slogan, “Movies are Better Than Ever.”

Are movies better than ever? Don’t know. But I do know that movies are
 longer than ever. Is longer better? Not necessarily. In fact, all I can say with complete conviction is that longer is… longer. 


  1. may be useful for all, helpful article once and pardon me permission to share also here Cara menyembuhkan splenomegali

  2. Your website is very attractive and neat. I expect this website to be more creative and innovative full. obat katarak distributor resmi obat herbal walatra bahaya memakai softlens obat lambung bocor

  3. given article is very helpful and very useful for my admin, and pardon me permission to share articles here hopefully helped Obat bronkitis kronis

  4. given article is very helpful and very useful for my admin, and pardon me permission to share articles here

    hopefully helped :

    Cara menyembuhkan tipes
    Obat ginjal bocor tradisional
    Obat gabagen alami

  5. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have to bookmarked to check out new stuff on your post.
    Affordable Gurgaon Escorts Roshanikhanna
    Female Escorts Services in Gurgaon

  6. Nice post i like it so much.I am very pleased to see your website which have rich information.





  7. thank you very useful information admin, and pardon me permission to share articles here may help

    Obat herbal miom
    Manfaat pisang ambon
    Obat tradisional kanker ovarium

  8. boston escorts Ninety-nine times than the theory of a more practical action。

  9. with a shield-like shell. Its shell contains seven solid dishes, similar to lobster. Although it is called an insect, it is not an insect at all. Birth control pills, their cousins, pine insects, are land-inhabited crustaceans that resemble lobsters more than an ant. They are gray-purple and have seven pairs of legs in addition to common antennas.شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرس
    شركة رش مبيدات بالرس
    ارخص شركة مكافحة حشرات

  10. I’d have to check with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!

  11. pinoybay tv-patrol-january-15-2021-replay-full-hd.

  12. All latest new information based on this article is explained really well in video Sathya Zee Tamil Serial format

  13. Watch all latest videos of drama melayu soaps online daily in HD.

  14. Family Tamil tv serial Eramana Rojave from Vijat TV at Eramana Rojave Tamil Dhool TV in high qiality.

  15. Assistir completo Vanitas no Carte 2 Legendado em HD Portuguese Legendado completo assista online ou baixe gratuitamente.